7, argued that the current six Black Voting Age Population (BVAP) majority district Assembly map violated section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. To fully understand the situation, it is helpful to review the chronology of events leading up to the presentation of the maps to SCOW on December 15, 2021.īLOC v Spindell, filed on Sept. The challenge for Governor Evers was to draw a map with superior core retention yet be reasonably bullet-proofĪgainst any VRA complaint. The Wisconsin Supreme Court (SCOW) ruled forĪ least-change map that did not violate the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and left it up to the parties involved to solve its problem. The Legislature wanted a map that changed the current six BVAP map the least. Pushed for a map containing seven Black Voting Age Population (BVAP) majority districts in the Milwaukee area. Black Leaders Organizing for Communities (BLOC), Voces de la Frontera, the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin and others Whether one agrees with the Governor’s Assembly map or not, one should be sympathetic with the predicament he faced. That represents the Village of Turtle Lake and straddles Barron and Polk counties and the small portion of District 93 (green) that represents Spring Valley and straddles Pierce and St. Examples: the little portion of District 75 (pink) Note that we are not counting pieces of intact municipalities that straddle two counties in two districts as splits. We do not consider Eau Claire and Pepin counties because edits made to District 93 in these counties would involve other districts. Involved with this submap are: Dunn, Pierce, Polk, and St. This submap has one muni split (River Falls split between districts 30 and 93). Districts neighboring 30 (red) are: 28 (violet), 29 (yellow), and 93 (green). Here is the portion of the SB 621 map that involves District 30. Improvement does not have to occur in all three areas, but none of the three areas The others are found in the Analytics section or can simply be observed. Reock compactness metricsĬan be found at the end of the Advanced Analytics section for the map. 630ģ) Your goal is to improve the map in at least one of three areas: a) decreasing total municipality splitting, b) decreasing total county splitting, or c) increasing the average Reock compactness rating. This is in accordance with the court-approved total deviation of 2%. The rest of the map must remain the same.Ģ) The population deviation of any changed district cannot exceed plus or minus 1% (595 people). The edited districts must be contiguous except for border cities and villages with non-contiguous boundaries. It is adjacent to districts 28, 29, and 93. In the example below, I chose District 30, the one in which I live. When done, please alert me including a copy of your report.ġ) You are only allowed to change the map for the district you chose AND its neighboring districts. Example: The map discussed in the 3rd tab will be named WIMAP 30. Add your initials to the district number on the map to proclaim your work.ĥ) Publish your map on DRA use the name WIMAP followed by the number of the district on which you are focusing. Ĥ) Edit your map following the given rules. It’s free and DRA has many instructional materials to help you learn.Ģ) Make a copy of the new Wisconsin Assembly (State House) map to edit.ģ) Choose an out-state district. That will speak for the people and traditional redistricting principles (see the Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau’s Redistricting in Wisconsin 2020.)ġ) If you haven’t already, register with Dave’s Redistricting App (DRA) and learn how to edit district maps. No, this will be a community of interest program, a crowd-sourced achievement We will also stay away from partisanship because that just leads to more divisiveness. Knows what changes any Voting Rights Act court challenges will bring. For the moment our attention will be turned away from the Milwaukee area because who Join with me in an exercise to make improvements to Wisconsin’s new Assembly map. Here is a challenge for all of you map enthusiasts out there. Stated in the state Constitution is that districts “be in as compact form as practicable.” This latter fault is especially troubling since one of the few regulations explicitly On the other hand, the average compactness of SB 621 compares unfavorably with Act 43. Notwithstanding the “least-change” policy adopted by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the new Assembly map (SB 621) can be lauded for reducing the number of municipalityĪnd county splits found in the previous map (Act 43). For better or worse, Wisconsin finally has state redistricting maps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |